« Home | Hunk of the Week » | Spoke lives online !!! » | What mythical beast are you? » | Plague infects World of Warcraft Players » | 2005 Fall TV Review - Part 1 » | Las Vegas - Season 3 » | Playing with your Food » | Disgaea Progress » | Legend of the Mid Autumn Festival » | Mid-Autumn Fesitival - Mooncake Season »

Oh No, What a waste of resources


Universal is bringing another "Fast and the Furious" sequel to theaters, and it's a movie that may star Vin Diesel, but possibly not Paul Walker.

People People People, there are better shows to watch that the "Fast and the Furious". Sigh...

After seeing this I did some checking. Fast and the Furious (2001) raked in $207 million worldwide and cost $38 million to make. Fast and the Furious 2 (2003) raked in $236 million and cost $76 million to make.

So its no wonder we are seeing a 3rd sequel. Am I missing something? I saw the 1st show and it was a passable action flick. Should I borrow the 2nd show?

It was a so-so movie. Good for a lazy nothing-to-do afternoon.

they just like to beat a good thing until the idea is dead

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

Blogs I Frequent