Oh No, What a waste of resources
Universal is bringing another "Fast and the Furious" sequel to theaters, and it's a movie that may star Vin Diesel, but possibly not Paul Walker.
People People People, there are better shows to watch that the "Fast and the Furious". Sigh...
After seeing this I did some checking. Fast and the Furious (2001) raked in $207 million worldwide and cost $38 million to make. Fast and the Furious 2 (2003) raked in $236 million and cost $76 million to make.
So its no wonder we are seeing a 3rd sequel. Am I missing something? I saw the 1st show and it was a passable action flick. Should I borrow the 2nd show?
Burning Crusade
Age of Conan
Jade Empire
It was a so-so movie. Good for a lazy nothing-to-do afternoon.
Posted by
Anonymous |
Sunday, September 25, 2005 9:11:00 AM
Post a Comment